stemedb/ai-lookup/features/simulation.md
jordan 3cfaa1e1d3 feat: Complete Phase 1 (The Spine) - storage foundation
Phase 1 delivers the complete durability and storage layer:

- WAL with crash recovery: Append-only journal with BLAKE3 checksums,
  fsync guarantees, and proper seek-to-EOF on reopen
- Storage engine: sled-backed KVStore with scan_prefix for range queries
- Content-addressed storage: H:{hash}, V:{hash}, E:{hash} key patterns
- Ingestor: Background worker tailing WAL, writing to KV with 8-byte
  aligned record headers for rkyv zero-copy deserialization
- Comprehensive tests: 31 tests covering crash recovery, round-trips,
  and multi-cycle durability

New crates: stemedb-wal, stemedb-storage, stemedb-ingest

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-01-31 14:15:34 -07:00

55 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown

# Simulation System ("The Infinite Game")
**Last Updated:** 2026-01-31
**Confidence:** High
## Summary
The Simulation is an Agent-Based Modeling (ABM) environment that validates StemeDB under emergent, adversarial, and evolutionary pressure. It simulates a society of AI agents with conflicting goals living within the knowledge graph.
**Key Facts:**
- Codename: "The Arena"
- Purpose: Integration testing via societal stress tests, not unit tests
- Architecture: `stemedb-sim` binary orchestrating agent swarms via tokio
- Agents communicate **only** through StemeDB reads/writes
**File Pointer:** `/simulation-vision.md` (full vision document)
## Agent Personas
| Persona | Goal | Behavior |
|---------|------|----------|
| Scientist | Converge on truth | High-confidence assertions, cites sources |
| Troll | Sow chaos | Low-confidence contradictions, frequent forks |
| Believer | Amplify consensus | Trusts high-reputation agents |
| Skeptic | Find variance | Reduces confidence of unverified claims |
| Historian | Preserve context | Resurrects dormant truths with new evidence |
## The Gameplay Loop
1. **Assertion**: Agent reads ground truth, creates assertion
2. **Fork**: Adversarial agent forks reality with contradiction
3. **Lens Resolution**: Query agent applies Lens (e.g., Consensus)
4. **Reputation Update**: TrustRank adjusts agent reputations
5. **Decay**: Unverified assertions fade via Dormancy Protocol
## Success Criteria
- Truth survives: High-reputation assertions outlive spam
- Lenses work: Consensus lens filters Troll noise
- Performance: 1000 concurrent agents without locking
- Emergence: Trust clusters form without hardcoded rules
## Metrics
Tracked via Prometheus/Grafana:
- `global_truth_convergence` - Entropy of the graph
- `agent_reputation_distribution` - Reputation spread
- `fork_depth_max` - Deepest branch depth
## Related Topics
- [TrustRank](./trustrank.md) - Reputation algorithm
- [Branching](./branching.md) - Fork mechanics
- [Lens System](../services/lens.md) - Query resolution