Phase 1 delivers the complete durability and storage layer:
- WAL with crash recovery: Append-only journal with BLAKE3 checksums,
fsync guarantees, and proper seek-to-EOF on reopen
- Storage engine: sled-backed KVStore with scan_prefix for range queries
- Content-addressed storage: H:{hash}, V:{hash}, E:{hash} key patterns
- Ingestor: Background worker tailing WAL, writing to KV with 8-byte
aligned record headers for rkyv zero-copy deserialization
- Comprehensive tests: 31 tests covering crash recovery, round-trips,
and multi-cycle durability
New crates: stemedb-wal, stemedb-storage, stemedb-ingest
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
55 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
55 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
# Simulation System ("The Infinite Game")
|
|
|
|
**Last Updated:** 2026-01-31
|
|
**Confidence:** High
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
|
|
The Simulation is an Agent-Based Modeling (ABM) environment that validates StemeDB under emergent, adversarial, and evolutionary pressure. It simulates a society of AI agents with conflicting goals living within the knowledge graph.
|
|
|
|
**Key Facts:**
|
|
- Codename: "The Arena"
|
|
- Purpose: Integration testing via societal stress tests, not unit tests
|
|
- Architecture: `stemedb-sim` binary orchestrating agent swarms via tokio
|
|
- Agents communicate **only** through StemeDB reads/writes
|
|
|
|
**File Pointer:** `/simulation-vision.md` (full vision document)
|
|
|
|
## Agent Personas
|
|
|
|
| Persona | Goal | Behavior |
|
|
|---------|------|----------|
|
|
| Scientist | Converge on truth | High-confidence assertions, cites sources |
|
|
| Troll | Sow chaos | Low-confidence contradictions, frequent forks |
|
|
| Believer | Amplify consensus | Trusts high-reputation agents |
|
|
| Skeptic | Find variance | Reduces confidence of unverified claims |
|
|
| Historian | Preserve context | Resurrects dormant truths with new evidence |
|
|
|
|
## The Gameplay Loop
|
|
|
|
1. **Assertion**: Agent reads ground truth, creates assertion
|
|
2. **Fork**: Adversarial agent forks reality with contradiction
|
|
3. **Lens Resolution**: Query agent applies Lens (e.g., Consensus)
|
|
4. **Reputation Update**: TrustRank adjusts agent reputations
|
|
5. **Decay**: Unverified assertions fade via Dormancy Protocol
|
|
|
|
## Success Criteria
|
|
|
|
- Truth survives: High-reputation assertions outlive spam
|
|
- Lenses work: Consensus lens filters Troll noise
|
|
- Performance: 1000 concurrent agents without locking
|
|
- Emergence: Trust clusters form without hardcoded rules
|
|
|
|
## Metrics
|
|
|
|
Tracked via Prometheus/Grafana:
|
|
- `global_truth_convergence` - Entropy of the graph
|
|
- `agent_reputation_distribution` - Reputation spread
|
|
- `fork_depth_max` - Deepest branch depth
|
|
|
|
## Related Topics
|
|
|
|
- [TrustRank](./trustrank.md) - Reputation algorithm
|
|
- [Branching](./branching.md) - Fork mechanics
|
|
- [Lens System](../services/lens.md) - Query resolution
|