jordan d3a88585fe feat: Phase 6 UAT - Admission control, HLC recency, cluster coordination

This commit includes comprehensive work on Phase 6 features:

## Admission Control (Phase 6 admission middleware)
- AdmissionStore implementation backed by TrustRankStore
- PoW verification with tier-based difficulty computation
- Trust tier progression (Newcomer → Established → Trusted → Authority)
- API integration with admission status endpoints

## HLC Recency Lens (Phase 6C)
- HlcRecencyLens for distributed system ordering
- Hybrid logical clock integration with causality preservation

## Cluster Coordination (Phase 6C)
- Multi-node cluster tests (availability, partition tolerance)
- CRDT convergence tests for anti-entropy sync
- Gateway handler improvements

## Aphoria Code Linter (Phase 2A)
- RFC/OWASP corpus builders with network fetching and caching
- Concept hierarchy with auto-alias creation on conflict detection
- Multiple security extractors (TLS, JWT, CORS, secrets, rate limiting)

## Code Organization
- Split large files into modules to comply with 500-line limit
- Improved test organization with separate test modules
- Fixed rkyv serialization for EigenTrustState (AgentScore struct)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-03 00:43:37 -07:00

2.3 KiB

Raw Blame History

Writing UAT Reports

When to use: After completing a phase, feature, or release and you need to document what was tested and the outcomes.

Prerequisites

Completed UAT testing session
Access to test results and logs
Understanding of what was in scope

Quick Start

# Create a UAT report following the template
cp uat/how-to.md uat/{feature}-{date}.md

# Edit with your results
# File naming: uat/phase6-distributed-2026-02-02.md

Report Structure

Every UAT report follows the template in uat/how-to.md:

Header — Date, phase/feature, tester, overall status
Summary — 1-2 sentences on what was tested
Scope — What was and wasn't tested
Environment — Rust version, OS, commit
Test Results — Tables with Expected/Actual/Status
Issues Found — Severity, status, description
Fixes Applied — Changes made during UAT
Recommendations — Future improvements
Sign-Off — Checklist for release readiness

File Naming

uat/{feature-or-phase}-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md

Examples:

uat/phase6-distributed-2026-02-02.md
uat/skeptic-endpoint-2025-12-15.md
uat/go-sdk-v2-2026-01-20.md

Test Result Tables

Use consistent formatting:

| Test | Expected | Actual | Status |
|------|----------|--------|--------|
| Build | Compiles | Compiled in 36s | PASS |
| Health endpoint | 200 OK | 200 OK | PASS |

Issue Severity Levels

Severity	Meaning
Critical	Blocks release, data loss risk
High	Major functionality broken
Medium	Functionality degraded but workaround exists
Low	Minor issue, cosmetic, or edge case

Sign-Off Checklist

Before marking a UAT complete:

All critical tests pass
No blocking issues remain
Documentation updated
Ready for release

Troubleshooting

Test results are inconsistent

Check the environment section — version mismatches cause false failures. Re-run in a clean environment.

Can't reproduce an issue

Document what you tried and mark the issue as "intermittent" with reproduction steps attempted.

2.3 KiB Raw Blame History